Large BioMed Track (largebio)
This track consists of finding alignments between the
Foundational Model of Anatomy (FMA),
SNOMED CT,
and the National Cancer Institute Thesaurus (NCI). These ontologies are semantically rich and
contain tens of thousands of classes.
UMLS Metathesaurus has been selected as the basis for the
track reference alignments.
UMLS is currently the most comprehensive effort for integrating independently-developed medical thesauri and ontologies,
including FMA, SNOMED CT, and NCI. The integration of new UMLS sources combines automatic techniques,
expert assessment, and auditing protocols.
Editions
Related publications
-
Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz, Asan Agibetov, Jiaoyan Chen, Matthias Samwald, Valerie Cross.
Dividing the Ontology Alignment Task with Semantic Embeddings and Logic-based Modules.
In the 24th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2020). [pdf]
- Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz, Bernardo Cuenca Grau and Ian Horrocks.
Is my ontology matching system similar to yours?.
The 8th International Workshop on Ontology Matching.
[pdf].
October 2013.
- Ernesto Jimenez-Ruiz, Christian Meilicke, Bernardo Cuenca Grau and Ian Horrocks.
Evaluating Mapping Repair Systems with Large Biomedical Ontologies. In
26th International Workshop on Description Logics.
In Volume 1014 of CEUR-WS.org.
July 2013.
- Catia Pesquita, Daniel Faria, Emanuel Santos, Francisco M. Couto.
To repair or not to repair: reconciling correctness and coherence in ontology reference alignments.
In OM 2013 workshop. [pdf].
October 2013.
- E. Jimenez-Ruiz, B. Cuenca Grau, I. Horrocks, and R. Berlanga.
Logic-based assessment
of the compatibility of UMLS ontology sources. J Biomed. Sem. 2 (2011)
[url]
OAEI results
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2021. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2021).
Volume 3063 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2021.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2020. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2020).
Volume 2788 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2020.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2019. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2019).
Volume 2536 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2019.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2018. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2018).
Volume 2288 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2018.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2017. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2017).
Volume 2032 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2017.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2016. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2016).
Volume 1766 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2016.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2015. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2015).
Volume 1545 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2015.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2014. In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2014).
Volume 1317 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2014.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2013.
In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2013). Volume 1111 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2013.
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2012.
In: Ontology Matching Workshop (2012). Volume 946 of CEUR-WS.org.
October 2012.
Contact
This track is organized by Ernesto Jimenez Ruiz and
Daniel Faria.
If you have any problems working with the ontologies or any suggestions
related to this track, feel free to write an email to ernesto [.] jimenez [.] ruiz [at] gmail [.] com
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the participants and organisers of the OAEI campaigns, especially Christian Meilicke,
for their help in the setting up of this track.
We also thank Bernardo Cuenca Grau and
Ian Horrocks for their unvaluable help in past editions of this OAEI track.
The track is currently supported by the SIRIUS Centre for Research-driven Innovation.
The track was also supported in the past by the SEALS,
LogMap, Optique and AIDA projects.
